Ni får gärna välja något annat tema från länken ovan, eller annan "case study" inom temat. Nedan följer instruktioner från Dartmouth. (Bara delvis tillämpliga - använd ert omdöme. Jag behöver ingen skriftlig redovisning) C:a 30 min / grupp.
Each team will divide itself into two groups. For the Speaker's corner, each group will present one side of a contemporary controversy in "science and public policy." After these presentations, the entire class will discuss the issues. Over the weekend, everyone not on the presenting team will write a one-page "reflection piece," discussing representations of science in the controversy. These reflection pieces will be distributed electronically to all class members. Individuals of the presenting group will then have one week to write a five-to-six page paper on how contemporary images of science are shaped, supported, and challenged in their case study. Each student will receive a group grade for the presentation as well as an individual grade for their paper.
Teams should meet regularly, starting at least two to three weeks in advance of your presentation. The goal is to work cooperatively in all phases: doing research on your topic, discussing among yourselves what you are learning, and what you want to convey to the class, and finally planning the final presentation. Creativity is encouraged!
The following is a list of topics and a brief description of the two sides embedded in the topic. Most are accompanied by a case study recommendation. These case studies help narrow the focus of the presentation and at the same time highlight critical issues at the heart of the topic.
|
4 |
|||
|
1 |
|||
|
3 |
|||
|
2 |
|||